I was reading a piece in the Wall Street Journal recently about the "AI revolution" in the workplace

The headline was telling: CEOs think AI is making everyone hyper-efficient, while employees are sitting there wondering where all this "extra time" is supposed to be coming from

It’s a classic disconnect

According to a survey by the firm Section, about 40% of executives claim AI is saving them more than eight hours a week. That’s a full working day

But when you look at the people actually doing the work? Two-thirds say they’re saving less than two hours. Many say they're saving zero

Why the gap?

It comes down to how the tools are being used

If you're a CEO, you're likely using AI to summarize a long report or draft a quick email

It’s a high-level win

But if you’re a UX designer or a coder, you’re dealing with the "hallucinations." You’re spending more time fact-checking and fixing the AI’s mistakes than it would have taken you to just do the job yourself

My view?

We see this all the time in digital transformation. Leadership buys the "dream" of the tool, but they forget about the "process" of the people

AI isn't a magic wand you wave over a business to make it faster. If your team is spending their day "babysitting" an algorithm, you haven't gained efficiency, you’ve just changed the nature of the struggle

True digital leadership isn't about the software you buy; it's about understanding how that software actually impacts the workflow of your human talent

Until the C-suite realizes that AI currently creates as much "work" as it "saves," that efficiency gap is only going to get wider